Add Update: Swift Packages and Frameworks
This commit is contained in:
parent
4202c04598
commit
8d73d7de4a
|
@ -66,3 +66,5 @@ After abandoning that idea, the other, similarly unsuccessful, tactic I tried wa
|
|||
That did not work. I don't know why. There seems to be very little visibility (read: none at all) into how Xcode chooses to static versus dynamic linking for Swift packages.
|
||||
|
||||
That's where I gave up, so if you have any better ideas, please let me know. At the end of the day, I don't have the energy to spend more time fighting Xcode over 20 megabytes. Oh well. I should probably throw a report into the void that is Feedback Assistant.
|
||||
|
||||
**Update:** As of April 2022, I've [resolved](/2022/swift-package-framework-update/) this issue.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|||
```
|
||||
metadata.title = "Update: Swift Packages and Frameworks"
|
||||
metadata.tags = ["swift"]
|
||||
metadata.date = "2022-04-07 22:36:42 -0400"
|
||||
metadata.shortDesc = ""
|
||||
metadata.slug = "swift-package-framework-update"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
A while ago I [wrote](/2022/swift-package-framework/) about some trouble I had getting Xcode to cooperate with my efforts to bring my app file size back under control after adding a new Swift Package dependency. Well, I'm happy to say I finally have: the most recent TestFlight build of Tusker has a 6.7MB install size, down from 25MB.
|
||||
|
||||
Ultimately I did take the route of turning my framework into a Swift Package. I revisited it because I noticed in another project that local packages inside the same folder as the main project worked perfectly fine. The only difference I found was that the project where it worked used only an `.xcodeproj`, whereas Tusker used an `.xcworkspace`. So, I deleted the (for unrelated reasons, no longer necessary) workspace and found that, after quitting and relaunching Xcode, the local package worked perfectly fine.
|
||||
|
||||
I briefly started writing a feedback report, but upon further testing I found that xcworkspaces in general weren't the problem—a new project and workspace worked fine. So, I gave up trying to reproduce it and assumed there was just something weird about the 3.5 year old workspace.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue