... instead of a glyphMap dict.
The parser does not actually need a reverse glyph order mapping as
it is not interested in knowing the glyphID from the glyph name,
but only whether a glyph is in the font or not.
This makes it easier for client code (e.g. ufo2ft feature compiler)
to use the feaLib Parser, without having to first construct and pass
it a glyphMap argument.
In OT kern subtable header, the format is the high byte of 'coverage'
bit mask (bits 8-15), and the low byte (bits 0-7) is the actual coverage
bits.
In AAT kern, it's the opposite: the coverage flags are the high byte,
whereas the subtable format is the low byte.
Also adjusted the test data, and set coverage to 1 for OT kern subtable
(which means the usual horizontal kerning).
Beyond composing ligatures, AAT finite-state transducers can also
execute insertion actions without rewriting existing glyphs. The
corresponding actions have almost the same structure as ligature
actions, so we can share a lot of the plumbing within fonttools.
This renaming is in preparation of a larger change to support `morx`
ables with insertions.
Before this change, we were emitting XML with numeric values for `morx`
coverage flags. Now, we emit XML that makes more sense to human readers.
XML files from previous versions of fonttools can still be parsed.
Before this change, the following glyph class:
@Vowels = [@Vowels.lc @Vowels.uc y Y];
Would be written back as:
@Vowels = [@Vowels.lc = [a e i o u]; @Vowels.uc = [A E I O U]; y Y];
Which is clearly invalid. It seems for GlyphClass.asFea() to work
correctly here we should be using GlyphClassName not GlyphClass
for the nested classes (similar to the code at the beginning of
parse_glyphclass_()).
The hexdump in the specification is wrong, but the correct value
is in the comments. Before this change, the finite-state transducer
in our test data could be decompiled but would not implement the
behavior explained in the AAT specification.
This test is not normally run. It is skipped when ufoLib is not importable,
as it's the case from the test runner's virtual environment.
The only reason it exists is so that I could check that the
ReverseContourPen I was writing behaves the same as using ufoLib's
ReverseContourPointPen when the latter is run through the
SegmentToPointPen and PointToSegmentPen converters.
The two methods for reversing contours now diverge since
https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/pull/1080,
but only nominally because both produce effectively the same results.
The only difference is that, when using the point pens with
outputImpliedClosingLine=True, the closing lineTo is always there even
when it's redundant. In our implmentation, we only output the closing
lineTo when it is the same as moveTo (this was necessary in order to
fix https://github.com/googlei18n/cu2qu/issues/51)
Nevertheless, the total number of points is the same in both cases.
Maybe this test should not be here, as it's testing functionalities
from a different package.
Closes https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/1081
One way to work around https://github.com/googlei18n/cu2qu/issues/51
when using the ufoLib's ReverseConturPointPen via the converter pens
would be to pass the outputImpliedClosingLine=True argument
(False by default) to the PointToSegmentPen.
This way, all the final lineTos are explicitly outputted, even when
they are redundant and could be implied (i.e. when they are not
duplicate points).
Note that this test is skipped by the CI, because ufoLib is not a
dependency of fonttools; you can run locally if you wish.
